← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32352/2019bail granted

Birju Mandal @ Birendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-15Mr. Justice Prakash Chandra Jaiswal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32352 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2019 Thana- HATHAURI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Birju Mandal @ Birendra Prasad Son of Jawahar Mandal Resident of Mohalla/Village- Dumramohan, P.S.- Hathauri, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Thakur Mr. Nilesh Kumar Mr. Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 142, 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 325, 333, 353, 427 and 435 of the Indian Penal Code. Over the road accident claiming life of three persons, there was large scale protest by the villagers led by the petitioner and others and mob of around 400-500 persons went on rampage raised anti-administrative slogans and also damaged the police jeep and assaulted the police personnel. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32352 of 2019(2) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He happens to be member of the mob. He never led any protest. Allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and similarly situated co-accused, namely, Devendra Mandal, Pappu Kumar @ Ramdayal Singh and Subhash Mandal @ Subhash Kumar Singh have been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the court below. On the other hand, learned APP opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Rosera at Samastipur in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 16 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T