Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8956 of 2023 ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Son of Bigan Yadav, resident of village-Lodipur, P.O. and P.S. Khizarsarai, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Public Health Engineering department , Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.
4.
The District Magistrate, Gaya.
5.
The Additional Collector, (Public Grievance Redressal)-Cum-District Public Grievance Redressal, Gaya.
6.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gaya.
7.
The Superintending Engineer, P.H.E.D. Circle, Gaya. 8.
The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Gaya. 9.
The Assistant Engineer, P.H.E.D. Gaya.
10.
The Junior Engineer, P.H.E.D. Khizarsarai, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ===================================================== = Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tripurari Sharan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.S. Raza Ahmad (Aag5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023 1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "That this writ application is being filed by the petitioner, the Citizen of India for issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent authorities to take necessary action in compliance of
Patna High Court CWJC No.8956 of 2023(2) dt.19-09-2023 2/3 order dated 30.11.22 passed in Complaint No.4351101 25032207749/2A by the Secretary-Cum-Second Appellate Authority (Public Grievance) Bihar, Patna whereby and whereunder the complaint made by petitioner with respect to "Nal- Jal Scheme) in Ward No.3,4,6,7,8,9 in Lodipur Panchayat within khizarasari Block in the District of Gaya has been directed to complete the same and to take necessary action against the concerned authority but despite several representation filed by petitioner the same has neither been complied nor any action has been taken and for grant of any other suitable relief /reliefs which be found entitled in facts and circumstances of the case."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Gaya for redressal of his aforesaid grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
It is needless to state that in case appropriate representation is filed by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.8956 of 2023(2) dt.19-09-2023 3/3 petitioners before the District Magistrate, Gaya, within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be considered, in accordance with law and disposed off by a reasoned and a speaking order, within a period of six weeks, thereafter.
4.
The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U