Karu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40704 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2024 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Karu Kumar Son of Anshu Dhiraj @ Dhiraj Kumar Resident of VillageKeoti, P.S- Keoti, Dist- Shekpura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barbigha P.S. case No. 86 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, police, on the basis of secret information that some miscreants who are the members of cyber crime gang are planning to commit fraud using ATM machine, raided the place of occurrence and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40704 of 2024(2) dt.21-06-2024 2/3 apprehended six persons including this petitioner. On search, one motorcycle, one mobile phone, one debit card and cash amounting to Rs. 10,000/- was recovered from this petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the recovered articles belongs to the petitioner and no any incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Bench vide order dated 14.05.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 86 of 2024. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.03.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40704 of 2024(2) dt.21-06-2024 3/3 the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Barbigha P.S. case No. 86 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T