Md. Muntasir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.22252 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2015 Thana -KASBA District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Md. Muntasir son of Md. Nausad Resident of Village- Chandbhati, PS Dagarwa, District Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saghir Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 09.02.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49352 of 2015 on the ground that petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2015, the informant has already been examined during trial, there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. submits that the informant in her deposition-in-chief has supported the prosecution version. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the detention of the petitioner further that now, there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and, as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22252 of 2016 (2) dt.29-06-2016 2/2 such, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Purnea in connection with Kasba P.S. Case No. 101 of 2015 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 501 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) SHAHZAD/- U T