Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22919/2016bail granted

Pramod Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-02Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22919 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -SACHIWALAYA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Pramod Kumar Mishra Son of Late Kameshwar Mishra Resident of Mohalla - Polytechnic College, Badarghat, P.S. Alamganj, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C.Jawahar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution story in brief is that five months before, the informant met the petitioner at a tea shop. After taking him in confidence, the petitioner said that you will get government job of Rs. 8000/- per month as a peon in Gardanibagh School, Patna. The petitioner took him to his Sir Kalyan Kumar @ Pappu. It is further alleged that on 7.1.2016 the informant paid Rs. 22,000/- and on 2/3/2016 he paid Rs. 31,000/- to Pappu for his service but no joining letter was provided to him. On suspicion that they are cheaters and they all are cheating the people, he asked Pappu to return back his money of Rs. 53,000/- but Pappu

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22919 of 2016 (4) dt.02-08-2016 2/2 refused to return the money and ousted him from his place. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2016. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of the witnesses against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. There is no other incriminating material against the petitioner. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let, above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Patna in connection with Sachiwalaya P.S.Case No. 19 of 2016.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U