Yamuna Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14039 of 2021 ====================================================== Yamuna Prasad S/o- Late Hari Pado Rajak Resident of Village- Mainpura, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The Accountant General of Bihar Birchand Patel Marg, Patna-1. 3.
The Commissioner-Cum- Secretary Department of Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Joint Secretary Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Chief Engineer (Yantric) Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
6.
The Regional Chief Engineer Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur.
7.
The Executive Engineer Public Health (Yantric) Division, Chhapra, (Saran). 8.
The Executive Engineer Public Health Division, Darbhanga. 9.
The Superintending Engineer Public Health Engineering, Darbhanga Anchal, Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG-4 For the AG :
Mr Arvind Ujjwal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-07-2023 Heard Mr. Mahasweta Chatterjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General and Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned AAG-4 appearing on behalf of the State.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed in Work Charge Establishment and, thereafter, as per the common decision, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.14039 of 2021 dt.06-07-2023 2/3 petitioner's services was taken into regular establishment. Learned counsel further informs that the similar work charge employees, who were taken into regular establishment, have been given the benefit of pension and other retiral dues. The case of the petitioner is identical to those employees, who have been given benefit of pension and other retiral dues and on these grounds the petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation before the Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar to decide the case of the petitioner in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Uday Pratap Thakur and Anr. vs. The State of Bihar and Ors. passed in Civil Appeal No. 3155 of 2023 @ SLP (C) No.10653 of 2018, which was heard by the Hon'ble Supreme Court with other analogous cases and Judgment has been passed on 28.04.2023.
3. The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar must consider the service records relating to the petitioner in the light of the Judgment passed by the Apex Court in case of Uday Pratap Thakur and Anr. vs. The State of Bihar and Ors. (Supra) as well as in the case of Smt. Amrika Devi & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. passed by the Full Bench of this Court reported in 2019 (4)
Patna High Court CWJC No.14039 of 2021 dt.06-07-2023 3/3 PLJR 355 and take final decision with respect to the entitlement of the petitioner for payment of full pension and its arrears along with applicable rate of interest on account of delayed payment within a period of four months. The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar must take notice of the fact that the petitioner is a retired person and before disposing of the representation of the petitioner, the petitioner must be given a prior notice to represent his case on any convenient date fixed by him.
4. With the above observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Manish/- Minu/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 10.07.2023 Transmission Date