Saket Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29516 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 1999 Thana -MOKAMAH DistrictPATNA ====================================================== Saket Kumar son of Late Awadh Kishore Singh, resident of villageChachraha, P.S. Bashopatti, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 12-08-2015 A supplementary affidavit has been filed today. Let it be kept on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 407, 420, 120-B of IPC.

Allegation is that accused persons including the petitioner convinced the complainant/informant & others to deposit Rs.2000/- per month and after 36 months Trikon Corporation will pay Rs.1,00,000/-.

It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. From perusal of the complaint petition

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29516 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 2/3 it appears that money has been given to the accused Shrawan Kumar for which receipts were granted to him. However, after investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for other side submits that the petitioner is also one of the accused who had encouraged the complainant/ informant to open the account.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri R. K. Verma, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Barh, Patna/court concerned in Mokama P. S. Case No. 193 of 1999 with following conditions:- 1.

The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2.

One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29516 of 2015 (2) dt.12-08-2015 3/3 bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T