Sangeeta Devi @ Sangeeta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45064 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2021 Thana- HATHAURI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

SANGEETA DEVI @ SANGEETA KUMARI W/o Ranjit Kumar Resident of Village- Bahadurpur, Sivajinagar, P.s.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur. 2.

Arbind Kumar Singh S/o Ramkhelawan Mandal Resident of VillageBahadurpur, Sivajinagar, P.s.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur. 3.

Shashikant Kumar Singh @ Shashikant Mandal @ Mantu S/o Dev Narayan Mandal Resident of Village- Bahadurpur, Sivajinagar, P.s.- Hathouri, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 427, 448, 354(B), 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution allegation, in short, is that accused persons assaulted the informant and family members and also tried to outrage the modesty of younger daughter-in-law of the informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45064 of 2021(2) dt.11-04-2022 2/2 petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is a case and counter case between the parties. A free fight is alleged to have taken place. The injury on the accused side has not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands. The petitioner no. 1 is a lady.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 44 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T