Sudhir Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28879 of 2015 (3) dt.07-10-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28879 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -173 Year- 2013 Thana -AKBARPUR District- NAWADA ====================================================== SUDHIR SINGH, S/O SHREE SINGH, R/O VILLAGE - KHARBUBIGHA, P.S. - NAWADA, DISTRICT - NAWADA. .... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
THE STATE OF BIHAR.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. T.N.Thakur(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 173 of 2013 registered under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is that on 19.09.2013 petitioner, brother in law of Dipu Singh, came to the house of informant and took Dipu Singh, son of informant. In the evening, elder son of informant, Rudra Singh, informed that Dipu Singh has been killed and his dead body has been thrown on the road. It is further alleged that two years earlier hand of Shimbi Devi, wife of Dipu Singh was fractured due to that reason his son called his sister-inlaw, Fulo Devo to his house to serve his wife and in that course his son developed illicit relation with Fulo Devi and started to live as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28879 of 2015 (3) dt.07-10-2015 husband and wife. Thereafter, petitioner along with others started to give pressure upon the deceased and Fulo Devi for separation but they refused due to that reason petitioner and others threatened the son of informant, Dipu Singh and Fulo Devi. On 18.09.2013 son of informant and Fulo Devi went to Nawada Court for lodging complaint where petitioner and others forcibly took them and they threatened to kill Dipu Singh. The informant raised suspicion against the petitioner and others to kill his son. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case mere on suspicion. It is further submitted that there is no internal and external injury was found on the person of the deceased. It is further submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 26.04.2015.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 173 of 2013.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T