Veena Ishwar v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, The Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1804 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17184 of 2024 ====================================================== Veena Ishwar Wife of Late Arunabh Ishwar, Resident of Flat No.- C/100, 1st Floor, Harmu Housing Colony, Ranchi, P.S.- Argora, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr. Raushan Kushwaha, the District Magistrate, Samastipur. 4.

Shri Sanjiv Kumar Kapar, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur. 5.

Mr. Dilip Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Samastipur Sadar, DistrictSamastipur. 6.

Mr. Balbir Das, the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Samastipur Sadar, District- Samastipur.

7.

Mr. Nishant Kumar, the Circle Officer, Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur. 8.

Mr. Anjani Kumar, the Electrical Executive Engineer, Transmission Division, 132/33 K.v. Grid Campus, Mohanpur, Samastipur. 9.

Vinit Kumar Ishwar, Son of Late Shiv Chandra Ishwar, Resident of villageSarairanjan @ Kabra, District- Samastipur. 10.

Manish Kumar Ishwar, Son of Late Shiv Chandra Ishwar, Resident of village- Sarairanjan @ Kabra, District- Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Vishambhar Prasad, AC to AAG-5 For O.P. Nos. 9& 10 :

Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, Advocate Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG-5 for the State.

2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the

Patna High Court MJC No.1804 of 2025(6) dt.09-01-2026 2/2 present case with liberty to file the appropriate petition before the appropriate authority.

3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

4. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present case is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U