← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/875/2021disposed

Arjun Saw v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-27Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.875 of 2021 ====================================================== Arjun Saw S/o Moti Saw R/o Maohalla- Chand Chaura, P.S.- Gaya, DistrictGaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate Gaya.

3.

The Sub- Divisional Officer Sadar Gaya.

4.

The Block Supply Officer Sadar Gaya.

5.

Marketing Officer Sadar Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vishal Saurabh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-10-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Upendra Pratap Singh, learned AC to SC 4 appearing for the State.

Though, the present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 29.06.2020, passed by the Sub Divisional officer, Sadar, Gaya, whereby and whereunder the license of the P.D.S. shop of the petitioner bearing License no. 124 of 2016 has been cancelled but the learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to file appropriate appeal under Rule 32(iii) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.875 of 2021(2) dt.27-10-2021 2/2 The learned counsel for the respondent State has got no objection.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate appeal before the appellate authority against the order dated 29.02.2020, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gaya and in case, such an appeal is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be decided on merits, in accordance with law, by a reasoned and a speaking order, without being impeded by the issue of limitation, within a period of eight weeks, thereafter. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U