← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34621/2025allowed

Vikash Kumar Jha @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-22Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34621 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- KIUL RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

Vikash Kumar Jha @ Vikash Kumar S/o Shambhu Nath Jha Resident of Bally Ganga Apartment No 11 P.S Bally District Hawrah (W.B) 2.

Ajay Agarwal S/o Late Raj Kumar Agarwal R/o 01/34 Ganpat Ray, Khemka Lane, PS. Lilua, Distt. Howrah (W.B.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from joint possession of the petitioners altogether 60.38 liters of country made foreign liquor was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34621 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/2 the petitioners has submitted that the recovery has been made from the joint possession. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial custody since 22.03.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with G.R.P. Kiul P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Lakhisarai. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T