Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33392/2015bail granted

Md.Murshid Khan @ Rinku Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2015-08-21Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33392 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2015 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== MD.MURSHID KHAN @ RINKU KHAN Son of Muslim Khan @ Md. Muslim Resident of Village/ Mohalla - Islam Toli, P.S.- Town, Aurangabad, District - Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 21-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act. Allegation is that the petitioner was apprehended by the police and on his confessional statement arms and ammunition used by the petitioner in a murder case were recovered from the house of the petitioner.

It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.1.2015.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has also criminal antecedent and after investigation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33392 of 2015 (2) dt.21-08-2015 2/2 charge-sheet has already been submitted.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad/court concerned after framing of charge in Aurangabad Town P. S. Case No. 14 of 2015 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T