Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24930 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24930 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -175 Year- 2003 Thana -MEERGANJ District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Bhagat S/o Late Hira Lal Bhagat R/o village - Chainpur, P.S. Hathua, District - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B.Ray Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion. The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 22.01.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55054 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2015 and now he has sufficiently been penalized, due to inadvertence earlier it was not stated that charge has already been framed on 06.10.2015 and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.
Learned APP fairly submits that now the petitioner by remaining in custody has been sufficiently penalized. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24930 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016 above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VII, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No. 444 of 2015 arising out of Mirganj P.S. Case No. 175 of 2003, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T