Sujeet Kumar Verma @ Sujeet Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31679 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -63 Year- 2013 Thana -AMBA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Sujeet Kumar Verma @ Sujeet Mehta S/o Late Budhdeo Mehta Resident of Village Dadhapa Bigha, P.S. Kutumba, District Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar No.6 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Madhuri Lata(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 19-08-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation against the petitioner is to have fired causing injury to the informant and other persons also started firing upon the informant. Then the informant managed to go inside his shop.

It is submitted that there are discrepancies between the statements of the informant and the doctor who has examined the victim and has found five injuries. Petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2014.

Learned counsel for the State submits that charge-sheet

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31679 of 2015 (2) dt.19-08-2015 2/2 has already been submitted against the petitioner. Petitioner has also criminal antecedent in six cases.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad/Court concerned after framing of charge in Amba P.S. Case No. 63 of 2013 with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sushma/- U