← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34458/2026allowed

Laldeo Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-23Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34458 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2025 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Laldeo Rai S/o Late Jugeshwar Rai Resident of village -Khajuhata P.O.- Darihara, P.S.- Driyapur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 303(2), 324(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) and 103(1) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with other ten accused persons started assaulting with lathi-danda. As the informant went to rescue, she was being assaulted by Ajit Kumar with rod. It is further alleged that one Durgesh Rai who was having sword in his hand has assaulted with sword to one Rajendra Rai. Rajendra Rai succumbed to injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34458 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as far as the allegation of assaulting Rajendra Rai is concerned that is specific on Durgesh Rai. The nature of allegation against this petitioner is general and omnibus. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.02.2026. Learned counsel has further submitted that similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 28672 of 2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 713 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T