Mithu Kumar @ Miththu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34973 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2024 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Mithu Kumar @ Miththu Kumar Rambabu Yadav @ Rambabu Rai @ Rambabu Singh R/o Village- Sheikhpura, P.S.- Ram Krishna Nagar, DistrictPatna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Saket Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-06-2025
1. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.1013 of 2025, arising out of Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case no. 597 of 2024 registered under sections 103(1), 61(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other accused and 5-6 unknown persons came at the house of the informant and resorted to firing upon the informant's husband from desi katta as a result of which he died on way to the hospital.
4. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that besides the petitioner having a good case on merits,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34973 of 2025(2) dt.09-06-2025 2/2 the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 14.2.2025 (Annexure-1) passed in Cr. Misc. no.3149 of 2025 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. The petitioner is in custody since 10.8.2024 and charge has been framed against the petitioner on 21.4.2025 vide order brought on record as Annexure-3 to the petition.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R., the liberty granted in the earlier order of rejection dated 14.2.2025, the petitioner being in custody since 10.8.2024 and charge having been framed in the learned trial Court, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.1013 of 2025, arising out of Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case no. 597 of 2024, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-I, Patna.
(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T