← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40548/2024allowed

Ekram @ Md. Ekram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-25Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40548 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2023 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Ekram @ Md. Ekram Son of Tajemul Resident of Village- Rangraiya Lal Toli ,P.S- Amour ,Dist- Purnea 2.

Aslam Son of Tajemul Resident of Village- Rangraiya Lal Toli ,P.SAmour ,Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 109 of 2023 registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners along with other is of killing the husband of the informant by tying a rope around his neck.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner are innocent and have committed no offence. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40548 of 2024(2) dt.25-06-2024 2/3 have falsely been implicated in this case. No any specific overt act has been levelled against the petitioners in respect of commission of murder of the informant's husband. It is further submitted from para-10 of this petition that both the petitioners are Mama(maternal uncle) of co-accused namely, Farzana and Ashna and only due to this reason, merely on suspicion, petitioners have falsely been dragged in this case. Nothing consistent material has come against the petitioners. Other co-accused persons, namely, Farzana and Ashna have already been granted bail by this Court vide Annexure-2 of this petition. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 14.03.2024.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the custody of the petitioners, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 109 of 2023 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40548 of 2024(2) dt.25-06-2024 3/3 Class, Purnea.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T