Rinku Kumari v. The State Election Commission Panchayat And ORS

Patna High Court CWJC No.9274 of 2016 (2) dt.20-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9274 of 2016 ====================================================== Rinku Kumari, Wife of Anuj Kumar Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. Mednipur, P.S. Nasriganj, Block- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna through the State Election Commissioner.

2. The State Election Commissioner, the State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

3. The Secretary, the State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

4. The District Election Officer (Panchayat), Rohtas at Sasram. DistrictRohtas at Sasaram.

5. The Block Development Officer, Nasriganj -cum- Returning Officer (Panchayat Election), Nasriganj Block, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

6. Rinku Devi, Wife of Ajay Kumar Vishwakarma. Resident of villageAtimiganj, P.O. Mahadeva, P.S. and Block- Nasriganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar -Manglam For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amit Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 20-06-2016 Learned counsel for the parties are present.

Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by passage of time the matter has been rendered infructuous as the grievance was redressed by the Commission itself and the writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) deepika/- U