Chandan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30975 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2013 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Chandan Ram Son of Bharat Ram resident of village - Raghunathpur, P.O. and P.S. Turkaulia, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 386 and 120 (B) of the I.P.C Allegedly, co-accused Munna Kumar @ Avinash Kumar demanded ransom of Rs. 1,00,000/- from the informant in the name of the petitioner and others and at that time the petitioner was in custody.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has got no concern with co-accused Munna Kumar, at the time of occurrence the petitioner was in custody in another case and only on the basis of criminal antecedent he has been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30975 of 2015 (4) dt.04-01-2016 2/2 implicated in this case also resulting he is suffering in custody since 18.04.2015, charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the petitioner was not caught and his name was taken by the co-accused. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Motihari, East Champaran in Turkaulia P.S. Case No. 98 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T