Mandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9606 of 2025 ====================================================== Mandeep Kumar S/o Ranglal Manjhi, R/o Village- Duabuli, PP- Dubauli, PSPanapur, District- Saran, Bihar- 841240. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar. 2.

The Controller of Examination, Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board (BCECEB), Patna.

3.

The Dean cum Principal, Government Medical College, Purnea. 4.

National Testing Agency (NTA), New Delhi.

5.

National Medical Commission, through its Director Under graduate Medical Examination Board, National Medical Commission Government of India. 6.

Central Bureau of Investigation through Superintendent of Police, CBI, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Apurv Harsh, Adv.

Mr. Manu Tripurari, Adv.

Mr. Raghu Raj Pratap, Adv.

Ms. Jaya Singh, Adv.

Mr. Hritik Anand, Adv.

Mr. Pranshu Prakash, Adv.

For the NMC :

Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sudarshan Bharadwaj, Adv.

For the CBI :

Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, Adv.

For the NTA :

Ms. Chhaya Kirti, Adv.

For the BCECEB :

Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard the parties.

2. Mr. Apurv Harsh, learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted at the bar that since the fact with regard to filing of the earlier writ petition has not been disclosed by the petitioner and, as such, the same could not be mentioned in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.9606 of 2025(7) dt.22-01-2026 2/2 present writ petition. However, after having confronted with the present situation, with the consent of the petitioner, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.

3. Learned Advocate for the respondents unanimously submitted that since the petitioner was knowing this fact that he had earlier moved before this Court and he ought to bring this fact before this Court, but the same has been suppressed, due to which the precious time of the Court is wasted.

4. Having considered the submissions advanced and the prayer made by learned Advocate for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn; subject to payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/-, which shall be deposited in the Patna High Court Legal Services Authority, within a period of four weeks.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U