Braj Nandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.915 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Braj Nandan Singh aged about 68 years ( Male ) Son of Jaleshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Mohanpur, Dharhara, Police Station- Dharhara, District -Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna 2.

The Secretary (Home) Govt. of Bihar 3.

The District Magistrate, District- Munger 4.

The Superintendent of Police District Munger 5.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar District- Munger 6.

The Officer-In-Charge Dharhara, District Munger 7.

Dilmohan Singh aged about - not known ( Male ) Son of Late Jaleshwar Prasad Singh 8.

Krishna Nandan Singh, aged about - not know ( Male ) , Son of Late Jaleshwar Prasad Singh 9.

Lalan Singh, aged about - not know ( Male ) Son of Late Jaleshwar Prasad Singh Resident No. 7 to 9, resident of Village- Mohanpur, Dharhara, Police Station- Dharhara, District- Munger.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Vikram Singh For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Divya Verma, A.C. to A.A.G. No. 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-06-2019 Heard Sri N.K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to A.A.G. No. 3.

The present criminal writ petition has been filed against an order passed under Section 144 of the Code Of

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.915 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2 Criminal Procedure, 1973 [ hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C."]. At the very outset, an objection was raised by learned State Counsel on the ground that petitioner is having statutory remedy.

Be that as it may, considering the fact that petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction in a proceeding under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. against which there is already statutory remedy available to the petitioner, there is no reason to entertain the writ petition.

The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) praful/- U T