← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1690/2024disposed

Bhushan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-30Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1690 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10205 of 2020 ====================================================== Bhushan Sharma Son of Shiv Sharan Singh, Resident of Village - Neori, P.O.- Neora, Police Station - Bihta, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Mr. Shivsat Kapil Ashok, the District Magistrate, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Priyedarshi, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Additional Advocate General 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 30-07-2024 The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 21.06.2021 passed in CWJC No. 10205 of 2020.

2. Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 would be a hurdle in entertaining the present petition. Coordinate Bench in the case of Dr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha & Ors. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. bearing M.J.C. No. 1840 of 2023 in C.W.J.C. No. 13888 of 2016 examined section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution, in which it is held that beyond one year from the date of the cause of action contempt petition is not maintainable. Recently, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S. Tirupathi rai

Patna High Court MJC No.1690 of 2024(3) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 Vs. M. Lingamaiah & Ors. reported in 2024 SCC Online SC 1764 in which also it is held that belated contempt petition shall not be entertained by the Courts.

3. Taking note of these facts and circumstances, the present contempt petition stands disposed of as not maintainable on the score that it is in violation of section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, reserving liberty to the petitioner to invoke appropriate remedy, if it is available.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcv/- U