Kundan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10005 of 2020 ====================================================== Kundan Kumar Singh son of Rudal Pratap Singh resident of villageNarainapur Ghat, P.o.- Narainapur, P.s.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Planning and Development, Bihar, Patna 2.

The Chief Engineer, Department of Planning and Development, Local Area, Patna 3.

The Superintending Engineer, Local Area, Engineering Organisation, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur 4.

The Executive Engineer, Local Area, Engineering Organisation, Work Division, Bagaha, West Champaran 5.

The Assistant Engineer, Local Area, Engineering Organisation, Balmiki Nagar, Bagaha, West Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore, AG :

Mr. Harish Kumar, GP 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-01-2022 The matter is heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:

"That this writ application is being filed for reinstant the petitioner on the post of Peon in Department of Local Area Engineering Organization, Division -2 Bagaha, as the petitioner was dismissed from the Service without any reason AND/OR pass such any order / orders, direction / directions, writ / writs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of this case."

Patna High Court CWJC No.10005 of 2020 dt.07-01-2022 2/2

2. Petitioner has not furnished material information so also order of termination.

3. It is learnt that petitioner is stated to have been appointed through private organization namely M/s Bright Intelligence & Security Services, therefore, the present petition is not maintainable as there is a contract between the petitioner and the aforesaid Agency. If he has any grievance, he has to raise dispute before the appropriate forum and not under Article 226 of the Constitution.

4. With the above observation, writ petition stands disposed off.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.01.2022 Transmission Date