Md. Tazmul Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37855 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2023 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Md. Tazmul Ansari Son of Late Alijan Mian @ Alijan Ansari Resident of Village - Garurbad, P.S.- Chakai, District - Jamui. 2.

Kushumi Khatoon Wife of Kalam Ansari Resident of Village - Garurbad, P.S.- Chakai, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press this application in respect of petitioner no.1.

3. Considering the aforesaid, this application is dismissed as withdrawn in respect of petitioner no.1.

4. Now, this application survives for petitioner no.2 only.

5. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 353, 307, 224, 225, 511, 506, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37855 of 2024(2) dt.26-07-2024 2/3

6. The allegation against the petitioner is that she along with other co-accused persons obstructed the police officials in discharging their duties and also tried to release the apprehended accused of Chakai P.S. Case No. 157 of 2022 from the clutches of the police.

7. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and she has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no concern with the accused of Chakai P.S. Case No. 157 of 2022. She has been made accused in the present case merely on suspicion. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

8. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

9. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as petitioner is a female and there is no specific allegation against her, let the above named petitioner no.2, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37855 of 2024(2) dt.26-07-2024 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 06 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

10. Accordingly, this application stands partly allowed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T