Ghuran Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9292 of 2023 ====================================================== Ghuran Paswan S/o- Charitar Paswan, Resident of Village- Kansi, P.O.- Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.
The District Magistrate, Collectoriate at Darbhanga, P.S. and P.O.- Laheri Sarai.
3.
The B.D.O., Darbhanga Sadar Block, District- Darbhanga. 4.
The C.O., Darbhanga Sadar Block, District- Darbhanga. 5.
The Panchayat Secretary, Kansi Panchayat, District- Darbhanga. 6.
Charitar Ram Son of Late Bal Govind Ram, Resident of Village- Kansi, P.O.- Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga. 7.
Mir Abid Ali Son of Mir Rajak, Resident of Village- Kansi, P.O.- Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
8.
Jeewach Bhagat Son of Sukhlal Bhagat, Resident of Village- Kansi, P.O.- Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
9.
Ram Sewak Bhagat Son of Sukhlal Bhagat, Resident of Village- Kansi, P.O.- Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
10.
Tabrej Alam Son of Jaffirul Hassan, Resident of Village- Narkatiya, P.O.- Kansi, P.S.- Simri, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kalyan Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. M. Nasrul Huda Khan ( SC-1 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 02-11-2023 We see that a counter affidavit has been filed, in which it has been specifically stated that encroachment case has been registered and notice has been issued as also an order passed on the very same subject land, the petitioner is concerned with. We would not make any observation on the merits since
Patna High Court CWJC No.9292 of 2023(4) dt.02-11-2023 2/2 the respondent, who is stated to be an encroacher would also have the remedy to file an appeal.
2. However, we find that there is absolutely no necessity to keep the writ petition pending, we dismiss the same. (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Rajiv Roy, J) sharun/- U