← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35739/2023bail granted

Lakhinder Ray @ Lakhindra Ray @ Lakhindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-14Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35739 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2023 Thana- DANIYAWAN District- Patna ====================================================== LAKHINDER RAY @ LAKHINDRA RAY @ LAKHINDRA YADAV S/O SURENDRA RAY R/O Village- Latiahi, P.S- Gangabridge, Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No. 13 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(2) (3), 36, 41(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 763.9 litre foreign liquor from the pick up van in question and apprehended co-accused Santosh Kumar disclosed the name of petitioner and others who are also involved in the alleged occurrence.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2023 and bears criminal antecedent of four cases in which two are of similar nature and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35739 of 2023(2) dt.14-06-2023 2/3 in all cases he is on bail. He further submits that petitioner is not apprehended on spot. He further submits that petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the said vehicle and nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovered liquor. He further submits that petitioner is quiet innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Court of Excise, Patna City in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case No. 13 of 2023, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35739 of 2023(2) dt.14-06-2023 3/3 remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) vashudha/- U T