Tufani Mian v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32860 of 2015 (3) dt.10-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32860 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -363 Year- 2014 Thana -SIKARPUR DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Tufani Mian Son of late Monib Mian resident of Village Chegauna, P.s Shikarpur, District West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 326, 337, 338, 307, 295, 295A of the Indian penal Code. At the very out set it has been submitted that in this case co-accused Sani Miyan having similar allegation has been allowed bail by the learned court below by B.P. No. 1527 of 2014 and other co-accused have also been allowed bail by the learned court below and the petitioner is in custody since 22.06.2015 and charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence and as such the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32860 of 2015 (3) dt.10-11-2015 deserves sympathetic consideration.
Learned A.P.P. does not oppose the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Bettiah, West Champapran in Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 363 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailor must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) M.Rahman/- U T