Mukesh Baitha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35386 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1008 Year-2019 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== Mukesh Baitha Son Of Prabhu Baitha R/O- Babu Parsauni, P.S.- Chautarwa, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Rekha Devi Wife Of Mukesh Baitha, Daughter Of Sugreev Baitha R/O - Babu Parsauni, Post- Manpur Makari, P.S.- Chautarwa, Dist.- West Champaran At Present R/O- Tesrahiya, Post- Manpur Makari, P.S.- Chautarwa, Dist.- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Zainul Abedin For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant, the State and the opposite party no.2.
The petitioner who is husband of opposite party no. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 427, 506, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3500/-per month, starting from this month, to opposite party no. 2.
In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35386 of 2022(4) dt.07-12-2022 2/3 petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3500/- per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in Complaint Case No.-C-1008 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-
(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.
(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no. 2.
(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.
(4) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35386 of 2022(4) dt.07-12-2022 3/3 reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(5) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(6) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T