Om Nath Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 7379 of 2018 ====================================================== Om Nath Prasad Son of Murari Prasad Sah, Resident of Village Post P.S.- Basopatti, District-Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director Secondary and Primary Education Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Bihar School Examination Board Bihar Patna through its Secretary. 4.

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. 5.

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board Patna. 6.

The District Education Officer Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the S t a t e :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey -Aag15 For the B S E B :

Mr P K Shahi, Sr Advocate with Mr Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board.

2 The petitioner, in the present writ application, has prayed for grant of the following reliefs:

"For issuance of an appropriate writ (s), direction (s), order (s) for direction to the respondent authorities to make necessary correction in the result of TET of petitioner and after making necessary correction publish the result of petitioner as per decision of the Bihar School Examination Board as in both the papers of TET there were two right options and to grant any other consequential benefits for

Patna High Court CWJC No.7379 of 2018(4) dt.15-12-2025 2/2 which petitioner may be found entitled in accordance with law."

3 All the parties are at one in submitting that the issue involved in this writ application is no longer res integra as the same issue has already been decided by a coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ashoke Krantti & Others -Versus- The State of Bihar & Others, reported in 2019 (3) PLJR 826. 4 Since the issue involved in this writ application has been considered and decided by the aforesaid judgment of this Court and the writ application was dismissed, therefore, this Court also dismisses the present application in terms of the judgment passed in Ashoke Krantti case (supra). (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U