← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39648/2024rejected

Amit Kumar @Amit Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-22Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39648 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2023 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Amit Kumar @Amit Thakur S/O Jogendra Thakur R/O Village- Markatta, P.S. and District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case No.97 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

Allegation against the petitioner is to have committed murder of son of the informant, namely, Raja Kumar and have also taken away a mobile belong to the Raja Kumar. 4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case, where, petitioner was not named in the FIR and his name surfaced on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39648 of 2024(4) dt.22-11-2024 2/3 statement of co-accused Laxmi Kumari as made in another case. It is submitted that nothing incriminating material surfaced during course of investigation, which may connect him with the present set of murder. It is also submitted that during dying declaration, injured Raja Kumar identified the photo of Chotu Kumar @ Namdeo, who has fired upon him and another coaccused, Sonu Kumar was driving motorcycle. It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2024. 5.

Learned APP appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6.

In view of the submissions, as made above and as name of the petitioner surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of other co-accused, namely, Laxmi Kumari, wife of the deceased and as it also appears from perusal of dying declaration of injured, namely, Raja Kumar that he has been identified the photograph of Chotu Kumar and Sonu Kumar and other accused persons present at the spot at the time of occurrence on 24.10.2023, where, present petitioner was under contact of Chhotu Kumar and Sonu and where the tower location of the present petitioner was around the place of incidence, which suggest the prima-faice involvement of the present petitioner , this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39648 of 2024(4) dt.22-11-2024 3/3 petitioner, at present.

7.

Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) S.Katyayan/- U T