← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2774/2016dismissed

The Vice Chancellor, B. N. Mandal University And ORS v. Govind Prasad Sah And ORS

2018-01-10Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2774 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8934 of 2014 ======================================================

1. The Vice - Chancellor, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

2. The Registrar, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

3. The Finance Officer, B.N. Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Govind Prasad Sah son of Late Shiv Narayan Sah resident of village - Tinpania, Police Station - Kasba, District - Purnia, supernnute Librarian, from M.L. Arya College, Akshy Nagar, Kasba Purnia.

2. The State of Bihar

3. The Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal, M.L. Arya College, Akshay Nagar, Kasba, Purnia.

5. The Vice - Chancellor, L. N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. null null

6. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. GA1 Anil Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 10-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Court is not satisfied with the reasons and justification, indicated in the modification application, to modify the order imposing cost upon the two authorities. In fact, if the payments etc. had already been done to the petitioner and his grievance had been redressed, these facts should have been brought to the notice of the Court, when the matter was taken up, because the writ application remained pending for almost two years. This is

Patna High Court MJC No.2774 of 2016(3) dt.10-01-2018 2/2 all the more reasons that the Court is not inclined to pass any order in favour of the petitioners.

The Court is not inclined to interfere with the order. Modification application is dismissed (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) skm/- U