← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36851/2022allowed

Chetan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-29Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36851 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2020 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== CHETAN KUMAR Son of Late Uma Shankar Singh Resident of Village - Maheshpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Smt. Anupam Kumari Wife of Chetan Kumar D/O - Sunil Kumar, Resident of Village - Ghoshate, P.O. and P.S.- Piri Bazar, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 498(A), 504/34 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim in association with his family members for nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36851 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has never made any torture upon the victim and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to grudge. He has never made any dowry demand from the informant. It is submitted that the petitioner is still ready and willing to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.

I perused the impugned order and it is mentioned that during the course of hearing, the petitioner was ready to keep the informant with her but the informant was not willing to go with him.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.273 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T