← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35753/2025rejected

Amarjeet Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-18Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2024 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan ====================================================== Amarjeet Sharma S/o- Yamuna Sharma @ Jamuna Sharma Village- Don Paschim Tola PS- Darauli District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Sharda Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection Darauli P.S. Case No. 137 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 15.05.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 379, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. According to prosecution case, the petitioner is sexually harassing the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35753 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/2 petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from perusal of the F.I.R./Complaint Petition, it transpires that the petitioner was sexually harassing the informant on the pretext of the marriage. He further submits that the statement of the victim was recorded under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. in which she has fully supported the case of the prosecution.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 137 of 2024 pending in the court of C.J.M., Siwan.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U T