Vikash Chandra Guddu Baba v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10851 of 2019 ====================================================== Vikash Chandra Guddu Baba, S/o Late Ramashrya Prasad, presently residing at Mahatma Gandhi Path, Kurji- Baluper, P.O. Sadakat Ashram, P.S.- Digha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary to the Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Chancellor Secretariat, Raj Bhawan, Patna. 4.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 5.

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

6.

The Controller of Examination, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikash Chandra Guddu Baba (In Person) For the Respondent-State :

Mr. Lalit Kishore, AG Mr. Vishwa Vibhuti Kr. Singh, AC to AG For the Respondent- Unv. : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 11-07-2019 While the petitioner appears in person, the respondent State is represented through the learned Advocate General who appears with Mr. Vishwa Vibhuti Kumar Singh and Mr. Ritesh Kumar, learned counsel appears for the Magadh University. Learned Advocate General invites the attention of this Court to a judgment passed in a batch of writ petitions arising from CWJC No.1965 of 2019 (Manjoor Alam Ucchtar Madhyamik Vidyalaya Anti, Gaya vs. the Bihar School

Patna High Court CWJC No.10851 of 2019(2) dt.11-07-2019 2/2 Examination Board & others) to submit that the issue has already been adjudicated upon and resolved by the learned Single Judge with consequential direction.

Having heard the learned Advocate General on the issue and besides the fact that the matter has been addressed upon by the learned Single Judge, even otherwise, the cause raised is absolutely personal and cannot be raised in a public interest litigation.

With the observation above, we dispose of the writ petition.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) skpathak/- U