Abdul Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34319 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1830 Year-2014 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== ABDUL RAHMAN Son of Md. Haarun Resident of Village - Bahera Tola, Kaziyana Sheikh Toli, P.S.- Bahera, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Musrat Praveen Wife of Abdul Rahman, D/O- Md. Suhail Resident of Village - Nazara Mahmada Durgapur Kachhari Tola, P.O. and P.S.- Manigachi, District- Darbhanga ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhusudan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1830 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 380, 386, 313, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

This case relates to torture and harassment due to nonfulfillment of four wheeler as further dowry demand and finally husband of the complainant and his family members ousted her from matrimonial home after snatching her belongings. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34319 of 2019(16) dt.24-03-2022 2/3 further alleged that petitioner has solemnized another marriage with another lady.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is husband of the complainant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never demanded any thing from the complainant. Petitioner denied second marriage. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity.

Learned counsel for the informant has asserted that complainant is also ready to live with her husband. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 1830 of 2014 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Darbhanga subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. If the complainant wishes to live with the petitioner,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34319 of 2019(16) dt.24-03-2022 3/3 she will file a petition before learned Court below. On receiving such a petition, the Court below shall issue notice to the petitioner, when it is expected from the petitioner to comply the undertaking given before this Court to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U