← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36569/2020disposed

Krishna Mohan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-17Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 36569 of 2020 Arising out of CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 77881 of 2019 Arising Out of PS Case No.-375 Year-2018 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Mohan Kumar, aged about 35 years (Male), Son of Devnarayan Sah @ Debu Sah.

2.

Dev Narayan Sah @ Debu Sah, aged about 59 years, (Male) Son of Late Premlal Sah.

Both resident of Village - Jogiya, PS- Alouli, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-02-2021 The matter has been heard via video conferencing.

2. Heard Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.

3. The petitioners seek modification of judgment dated 31.08.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 77881 of 2019, for correction of the name of the father of the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that there was typographical error in writing the name of the father of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36569 of 2020 dt.17-02-2021 2/2 the petitioners in the main application due to which wrong parentage has been typed in the judgment dated 31.08.2020 and, thus, prayer was made for correcting the same.

5. The Court finds the petition to be misconceived. Since there was error in the application itself, the same was typed in the order. Thus, if there is to be any correction, the petitioners have to get the correction made in their application and only then there can be any corresponding correction in the judgment.

6. In view thereof, the application stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh application. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T