← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35722/2023bail granted

Dhiraj Kumar @ Chedi @ Chhedi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-11Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35722 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-368 Year-2022 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar @ Chedi @ Chhedi Yadav Son of Late Jawahar Mahto Resident of village - Tarsan Kishuni, P.S. - Sadar, Distt. - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No.368 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 356, 379, 414, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 12.12.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to have in possession of one stolen mobile alongwith other co-accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35722 of 2023(2) dt.11-07-2023 2/3 persons, where petitioner was apprehended by police during the routine checking.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the motorcycle was jointly occupied and alleged stolen mobile was recovered from the possession of co-accused, namely Monu Kumar, and not from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in one more case, where he is on bail and moreover, investigation of this case has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has already submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail.

In view of the facts and circumstances as mentioned above as alleged stolen mobile was not recovered from this petitioner, rather from co-accused Monu Kumar, coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted, where petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2022, accordingly petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Karja P.S. Case No.368 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35722 of 2023(2) dt.11-07-2023 3/3 1st Class, Muzaffarpur/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) S.Tripathi/- U T