Patna High CourtC. REV./351/2016dismissed

Jaymangal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-23Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.351 of 2016 Arising out of Letters Patent Appeal No. 183 of 2014 Along with Interlocutory Application No.7766 of 2016 And Interlocutory Application No.8163 of 2016 =========================================================== Jaymangal Prasad, son of Sri Banarasi Prasad, resident of village-Bhagwanpur, P.O. Gheghwa, P.S.- Madhuban, District-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/ Respondent

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Teacher Appointment Appellant Authority, East Champaran at Motihari, District-East Champaran through its Member.

3. The Member of the District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, East Champaran at Motihari, District-East Champaran.

4. The District Superintendent of Education, East Champaran at Motihari.

5. The Block Education Officer, Tetariya, P.S. Madhuban, District-East Champaran.

6. The Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat Raj Kothiya, Block Tetariya, P.S. Madhuban, District-East Champaran.

7. The Panchayat Secretary of the Gram Panchayat Raj Kothiya, Block Tetariya, P.S.-Madhuban, District-East Champaran.

.... .... Opposite Parties/ Respondents

8. Rajeev Kumar, son of Sri Uma Shankar Singh, resident of village-Kothiya, Police Stateion-Madhuban, District-East Champaran. .... ... Opp.Party/Appellant.

=========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

===========================================================

Patna High Court C. REV. No.351 of 2016 dt.23-11-2016 2/3 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 23-11-2016 Re.: Interlocutory Application No.7766 of 2016 The application is for condonation of delay of 2 days in filing of the present Civil Review Petition.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, we find that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Consequently, we condone the delay in filing of the present Civil Review Petition. Interlocutory Application stands allowed accordingly. Re.: Interlocutory Application No.8163 of 2016 & Civil Review No.351 of 2016 The present review application is to seek review of the order passed by this Court on 23rd June, 2016 pointing out that even though this Court has ordered that there should be a fresh selection process, but still the appellant of L.P.A. No.183 of 2014 has been offered appointment, which is contrary to the order passed by this Court.

It that be so, the applicant-petitioner has to seek his remedy in accordance with law, but that will not be a ground for review of the order.

We do not find any error apparent on record, which may

Patna High Court C. REV. No.351 of 2016 dt.23-11-2016 3/3 warrant review of the order. The Civil Review Petition and the Interlocutory Application stand dismissed.

(Hemant Gupta, ACJ) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Sunil AFR/NAFR N. A. F. R.

CAV DATE N. A.

Uploading Date 25.11.2016 Transmission Date