Golu Kumar @ Harswardhan Bhardwaj @ Harsh Bardhan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34767 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Harswardhan Bhardwaj @ Harsh Bardhan Kumar S/o Late Pankaj Singh @ Ravindra Kumar Singh R/o vill - Bishwanath Nagar, Gali No. 3, P.s.- Nagar, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-329(4), 353, 351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Allegedly, the petitioner and his cousin came to the house of the informant and having abused her, they fled away. After sometime, the informant heard the sound of firing and the co-accused was seen fleeing away. It is also alleged that the informant's son informed her that two persons who opened fire were travelling on a motorcycle covering their face.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The son of the informant was accused in a rape case and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34767 of 2025(4) dt.17-11-2025 2/2 informant suspected that the rape case was lodged at the instance of the petitioner and that is why, he falsely implicated the petitioner. Nothing was recovered from his possession. According to FIR itself, the accused persons had covered their faces, which shows that the informant did not identify those miscreants. This case has been lodged merely on the basis of suspicion. Except the criminal antecedents, there is nothing against the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks before the court below be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 43 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of B.N.S., 2023.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T