← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39834/2024bail granted

Prince Kumar @ Prince Taitu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39834 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Prince Kumar @ Prince Taitu Son of Md. Jamaluddin Resident of MohallaSankat Mochan Mandir Ke Pass, Bata More, P.S- Kotwali, Dist- Gaya 2.

Santosh Kumar @ Shivam Tiwari Son of Late Ram Kumar Tiwari Resident of Mohalla- New Area Piparpati, P.S- Kotwali, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priya Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anish Chandra, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-06-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 has antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is a person with clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with an allegation that while the children were playing cricket an altercation took place on which the petitioners fired upon the informant and his friends. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners were also playing cricket match but then a dispute arose in which both sides assaulted each

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39834 of 2024(3) dt.26-06-2024 2/2 other and as far as allegation of firing is alleged, the same is an exaggerated allegation as no one was injured nor any empty cartridge was recovered from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 132 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. One of the bailors of the petitioner no. 1 shall be his father Md. Jamaluddin and bailor of petitioner no. 2 shall be his brother Ramakant Kumar.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T