Ranjit Kumar Sharma @ Pappu Pandey @ Ranjeet Pandey @ Pappu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35680 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2015 Thana -PUSA District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Ranjit Kumar Sharma @ Pappu Pandey @ Ranjeet Pandey @ Pappu, Son of Late Jai Kishun Sharma, Resident of Village - Mahmadpur Birauli, P.S. - Pusa, District - Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amitabh Bhardwaj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 28-08-2015 This is an application, made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accusedpetitioner, namely, Ranjit Kumar Sharma @ Pappu Pandey @ Ranjeet Pandey @ Pappu, in connection with Pusa Police Station Case No. 24 of 2015, under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Perused the above application and materials on record.
Heard Mr. Amitabh Bhardwaj, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Smt. Anita Kumari Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been implicated in this case out of malice, enmity and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35680 of 2015 (2) dt.28-08-2015 2/3 grudge.
In view of the fact that the accused above-named has been in custody since 09.04.2015 in connection with the case aforementioned and though charge sheet has been submitted on 30.05.2015, trial has not yet commenced and perusal of the materials available does not reveal such incriminating materials, which would warrant further detention of the accused-petitioner in custody, and in view also of the fact that the perusal of the materials available on record does not reveal that the accused-petitioner's liberty on bail would adversely affect his trial, it is, in the interest of justice, hereby directed that the accused above-named shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with PUSA Police Station Case No. 24 of 2015.
This direction for bail is further subject to the condition that the accused above-named shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence and shall appear, in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35680 of 2015 (2) dt.28-08-2015 3/3 learned Court below, as may be directed.
In terms of the above observations and directions, this bail application shall stand disposed of. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) K.C.jha/- U T