← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10497/2020dismissed

Shashi Bhushan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-24Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10497 of 2020 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Mishra S/o Late Shobhmani Misra, Resident of Village - Atwa Durg, P.S. Mirganj, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.

3.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 4.

The District Supply Officer, Gopalganj.

5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Gopalganj. 6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Hathua, District Gopalganj. 7.

The Block Supply Officer, Hathua, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 24-01-2022 This application has been taken up for online hearing through video conference because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

The petitioner's licence to run a Fair Price Shop under Bihar Trade Articles (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984 was cancelled vide order dated 18.05.1986 contained in memo No. 760.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10497 of 2020(3) dt.24-01-2022 2/2 Without seeking quashing of the said order, the petitioner is seeking a direction from this Court to the respondents to take appropriate action for restoration of the said PDS dealership licence of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been continuously approaching the authorities for restoration of his licence.

In our view, it will be inappropriate for this Court to interfere in the matter as this case has been filed nearly 34 years after cancellation of the said licence.

This application is thoroughly misconceived and is dismissed accordingly.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) K.K.RAO/- U