M/S Budha Construction v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8772 of 2020 ====================================================== M/s Budha Construction, through its Partner Srikant Kishor Kashyap, aged about 62 years (Male), Son of Upendra Sharma, Resident of Near Maruti School, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Bihar State Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited through its Managing Director, Shiksha Bhawan, Bihar Rastrasabha Parishad Campus, Acharya Shiv Pujan Sahay Saidpur Path, Saidpur, Patna. 3.
The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Assistant Engineer, Bihar State Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Bihar, Patna.
6.
Magadh University through its Registrar, Bodhgaya, Gaya 7.
The University Engineer, Magadh University, Bodhgaya, Gaya. 8.
The Indian Institute of Management through its Registrar, Bodhgaya, Gaya. 9.
The Director, Indian Institute of Management of Bodhgaya, Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
A.C. to A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-02-2021 The matter has been listed today for consideration through video conferencing.
It is submitted by Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel representing the petitioner that during pendency of this writ application, the primary relief prayed for in the writ petition for a direction for closure of the agreement does not subsist any
Patna High Court CWJC No.8772 of 2020(5) dt.17-02-2021 2/2 more, as the agreement has already been closed and steps are being taken for ascertaining the amounts payable to the petitioner (settlement of the bills). It is submitted that in case any cause of action arises in the process, the petitioner may be permitted liberty to raise the same. The writ application, however, in so far as the primary relief is concerned, has become infructuous.
With liberty as aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) PNM U T