← Library
Patna High Court/40725/2023bail granted

Bulbul Kumar @ Bulbul Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-19Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40725 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2022 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== BULBUL KUMAR @ BULBUL RAM Son of Padarath Ram Resident of Village- Bhadaunsi, PS- Korma, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sheikhpura (Sirari O.P.) P.S. Case No. 353 of 2022 dated 22.06.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/s 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, some unknown miscreants are alleged to have snatched Rs. 32,00 /- in cash, one golden Bajrangbali locket from the informant. They also snatched Rs. 5,00/- and a mobile from his labourer namely, Sunil Shaw. They also assaulted the informant causing injury on his neck and eye.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40725 of 2023(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused Sonu Kumar. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No TIP has been conducted by the prosecution. The stolen mobile was recovered from the conscious possession of the coaccused Sonu Kumar. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 28.04.2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura (Sirari O.P.) P.S. Case No. 353 of 2022.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T