Naresh Anand v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 12078 of 2016 =========================================================== Naresh Anand son of Late Sukhdeo Prasad Resident of village- Pariya, P.S Bariarpur, District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner Bhagalpur, Division, Bhagalpur.

2. The Executive Engineer, Bridge Construction Department Bhagalpur.

3. The Divisional Railway Manager Railway Manager, Eastern Railway, Danapur, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Munger.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== For the Petitioner/s : Mr Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Prabhat Kumar Verma, AAG III with Mr S K Sharma, AC to AAG 3 For the R a i l w a y : M/s Anil Kr Sinha & Abhimanyu Deo, Advocates =========================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH And HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH) Date: 24-10-2016 The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to a road over bridge being constructed across the railway line at Bariarpur as a substitute to the underpass which existed from before. His grievance is that the road over bridge would create more problem when the flow of water from the river Ganga enters their village or their habitat. 2 In our view, it is not a matter in which Court's intervention is required, for no fault in the planning is pointed out. There is a vague apprehension, unfounded on facts. We are cognizant

Patna High Court CWJC No.12078 of 2016 dt.24-10-2016 2/2 of the fact that the State authorities would have taken all relevant issues into consideration before sanctioning this project which is long delayed and over delayed.

3 For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere. This application, thus, stands disposed of. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) M.E.H./- U