Ramesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41173 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2023 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

RAMESH KUMAR SINGH SON OF AATENDRA SINGH @ Atendra Prasad Singh RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NARAR (WEST), WARD NO.5, P.S. - KALUAHI, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI 2.

ANIL KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE SATYA NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NARAR (WEST), WARD NO.5, P.S. - KALUAHI, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI 3.

AMIT KUMAR SINGH SON OF LATE UPENDRA SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NARAR (WEST), WARD NO.5, P.S. - KALUAHI, DISTRICT - MADHUBANI ... ... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kusum Rani , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP For the informant :

Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and the State .

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41173 of 2024(3) dt.19-08-2024 2/3 registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 363 , 366 (A), 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code . 3 . As per F.I.R., all the accused persons including these petitioners kidnapped the minor daughter of informant. 4 It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R.,. The name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation . He further submits that as per the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr. P C the specific accusation of kidnapping the victim is against co-accused Balram Singh and so far as these petitioners are concerned they are only alleged to have assisted the co-accused Balram Singh and there is no specific role of these petitioners in kidnapping the victim. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State as well as informant vehemently opposed the bail petition .

6 Considering the statement of the victim, clean antecedent of the petitioners and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41173 of 2024(3) dt.19-08-2024 3/3 Judicial Magistratwe 1st Class Madhubani in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 229 of 2023 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T