Patna High CourtCR. WJC/763/2016withdrawn

Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-29The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.763 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Bipin Kumar, son of Sri Kamaleshwari Prasad resident of VillageDhanauli, P.S. Baheri District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Unit, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Unit, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga, District Darbhanga.

7. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Biraul, District- Darbhanga.

8. Surendra Yadav son of Late Muneshwar Yadav resident of VillageDhanuali, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga.

9. Renu Devi wife of Surendra Yadav resident of Village- Dhanauli, P.S. Baheri District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhubneshwar Prasad, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard Mr. Bhubneshwar Prasad, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Staterespondents. Having regard to the fact that though the petitioner has made allegations of misuse of power and accumulation of disproportionate assets against the private respondents, the petition is completely vague and does not, therefore, warrant invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.763 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016 2/2 Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

While, accordingly, allowing the writ petition, as sought for, to be withdrawn, we give the petitioner liberty to lodge, if so advised, a First Information Report with jurisdictional police station or file a complaint in the criminal court of competent jurisdiction.

If a First Information Report is lodged or the complaint is filed, the same shall be dealt with expeditiously and in accordance with law.

With the above observation, this writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

(I.A. Ansari, CJ) K.C.jha/- U T