Amit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36143 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -281 Year- 2014 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Amit Singh Son of Shambhu Prasad Singh resident of village and Police Station - Baligaon, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Narayan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kr.Jha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under section 364 (A) of the I.P.C Allegedly, Aatish Kumar, the son of the informant, went for up-to-dating the pass book on motorcycle on 23.06.2014 but did not return and for that Sanha was lodged, and then it was suspected that unknown miscreants had kidnapped the son of the informant for ransom and during investigation the name of the petitioner transpired. In the statement of the witnesses and also the victim after release stated his name.

Submission is that the victim has been safely released. The petitioner has voluntarily surrendered as per direction of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36143 of 2015 (3) dt.24-11-2015 2/2 Hon'ble Court itself in Cr. Misc. No. 41413 of 2014. The petitioner is suffering in custody since 15.04.2015 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the victim has also stated the name of the petitioner besides the witnesses and the co-accused confessing his guilt has also stated the name of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering that the victim has been safely released and he has not stated regarding payment of any ransom and as such considering detention of the petitioner now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M.

Vaishali at Hajipur in Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 281 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.