Asha Devi v. The State Of Bihar ,Through The Chief Secretary, The Government Of Bihar Old Secretariat, Patna And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.716 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PATNA =========================================================== Asha Devi W/o Rajendar Ram Moh. East Lohanipur, Opp Das Koti, P.S. Kadamkuan, P.O. Kadamkuan, District - Patna, Bihar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, the Government of Bihar Old Secretariat, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Government Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Patna District Patna

4. The Superintendent of Police, Patna, District Patna

5. The Sub - Divisional Magistrate, Patna Sadar, District Patna

6. The Circle officer, Patna Sadar, District Patna

7. The Station House officer of Police Station, Kadamkuna, District - Patna

8. Kumara Sharita Sinha W/o Sanjay Kumar R/o Moh. - Rajendar Nagar, Road No. 10, P.O. Rajendar Nagar, P.S. Kadamkuna, Patna

9. Sanjay Kumar S/o Not Known R/o Moh. - Rajendar Nagar, Road No. 10, P.O. Rajendar Nagar, P.S. Kadamkuna, Patna

10. Naresh Kumar Das S/o Late Dashrath Ram R/o Bhutnath Road, Jantha Flat Colony, Flat No. 431, Sector - 6, Housing Colony, Agamkuan, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar, AC to GA-9. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 31-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court claiming a direction to the respondents to provide protection of his life and property from respondent nos. 7 to 9.

3. The petitioner and private respondents are members of the same family, inasmuch as the petitioner is the daughter of Late Dasrath Ram, whereas respondent no. 10 is her

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.716 of 2016 dt.31-08-2016 2/2 brother, whereas respondent nos. 8 and 9 are purchasers of the land from the brother of the petitioner. There is a history of civil proceedings between the parties. Since the issue is between the family members and that in the absence of any threat perception to life and property of the petitioner, the police cannot provide security to the petitioner.

4. I do no find any merit in the present writ application. The writ application is, thus, dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, J.) Mishra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 07.09.2016 Transmission Date N.A.